Polite, logical reasoning has proven to be an ineffective approach. So what can be done? I've run out of steam. I think the bottom line is: Those in power just really really do not want it here. But propaganda itself is both influencial and art (see: Karl Orff) Should wikipedia likewise refuse to allow links to that content? Good point about the inconsistency.
Links to nazi memorabilia and nazi propganda could be illegal in some jurisdictions likewise would liks to propoganda regarding liberty and democracy.
How is allowing a catalog of, say, Vivid video productions allowable and within the guidelines while the same sort of list relevant to the LS works, not? All great art is both controversial and influencial - that's the entire point: great art stiumlates discussion. 05:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC) I do not understand one point being (inconsistently) made here: the work of LS was indeed both controversial and influencial to the greater child model industry.
